I asked for this early...long before it was too late. (Existing valid
programs ma have variables named 'do' so it is a non starter in that form.

Rob's objection was wise and thoughtful. He wanted Go to be friendly to
program transformation and he felt that a single uniform iteration
construct would be "more better" for that than the workarounds you have
been shown would be "more bad" stylistically.

I did not get what I asked for, but I did get an education about careful
trade offs.

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:06 AM <milo.christian...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's not really, it is just syntactic sugar. I just happen to think that
> this kind of loop is common enough to have dedicated syntax. Not
> necessarily the syntax I used in my example (that has its issues), but
> something similar.
>
> Your example it is how I do it myself currently :)
>
>
> On Friday, March 3, 2017 at 6:00:46 PM UTC-5, peterGo wrote:
>
> milo,
>
> How is your loop different from this?
>
>     for {
>         // <loop body actions>
>         if condition {
>             break
>         }
>     }
>
> Peter
>
> On Friday, March 3, 2017 at 5:00:41 PM UTC-5, milo.chr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I rather like Go's loops, they are simple and easy to remember, and the
> problem so many languages have with dozens of different loop keywords is
> neatly avoided. Too many loop types is simply a pain, but I think that one
> more wouldn't hurt...
>
> Basically the following would be helpful in some cases without being too
> "odd" compared to what is existing:
>
> do{
>      // <loop body actions>
> }for condition
>
> Is this a good idea? Why or why not? Anyone else have a better idea for
> the syntax? (depending on how you look at it either "do" or "for" is
> redundant, but removing "do" would probably require too much lookahead)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-- 
Michael T. Jones
michael.jo...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to