milo,
How is your loop different from this?
for {
// <loop body actions>
if condition {
break
}
}
Peter
On Friday, March 3, 2017 at 5:00:41 PM UTC-5, milo.chr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I rather like Go's loops, they are simple and easy to remember, and the
> problem so many languages have with dozens of different loop keywords is
> neatly avoided. Too many loop types is simply a pain, but I think that one
> more wouldn't hurt...
>
> Basically the following would be helpful in some cases without being too
> "odd" compared to what is existing:
>
> do{
> // <loop body actions>
> }for condition
>
> Is this a good idea? Why or why not? Anyone else have a better idea for
> the syntax? (depending on how you look at it either "do" or "for" is
> redundant, but removing "do" would probably require too much lookahead)
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
