On Friday, January 27, 2017 at 3:38:12 AM UTC+8, Jakob Borg wrote:
>
> It depends. A call to new can (and will, often) give you a pointer to a 
> stack allocated object. If you pass that pointer to something like 
> fmt.Println() you'll see the object escape to the heap, get flagged by -m, 
> and presumably forbidden by -+. 
>

so

new(T)

is just a sugar of the following one?

var t T; &t
 

>
> //jb 
>
> > On 26 Jan 2017, at 20:10, T L <tapi...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > 
> > It looks a call to new will not be reported by -m either. 
> > 
> > I still don't understand what are implicit memory allocations, could you 
> make an explanation? 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to