Thanks a lot for your valuable suggestions. I think the one using SSA form will be helpful for my project.
On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 7:38:13 AM UTC+5:30, adon...@google.com wrote: > > If you're building tools for source code analysis, you may find the > golang.org/x/go/ssa representation easier to work with than the internals > of the compiler. Build and run this command to see an example: > > $ go get golang.org/x/tools/cmd/ssadump > $ ssadump -build=F fmt > > Alternatively, the cmd/vet tool in the standard library has an internal > subpackage that constructs the control-flow graph of a function. In this > representation, each block contains a sequence of Go statements and > expressions, not low-level SSA instructions. > > Which of these forms of control-flow graph is most appropriate depends on > the (unmentioned) problem you're trying to solve. > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
