I concur. On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 4:35:13 AM UTC+1, Michael Jones wrote: > > Details of this would make a great Go Blog post… > > > > *From: *adonovan via golang-nuts <golan...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> > *Reply-To: *<adon...@google.com <javascript:>> > *Date: *Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 6:07 PM > *To: *golang-nuts <golan...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> > *Cc: *<tgula...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > *Subject: *Re: [go-nuts] CFG for a Go program > > > > If you're building tools for source code analysis, you may find the > golang.org/x/go/ssa representation easier to work with than the internals > of the compiler. Build and run this command to see an example: > > > > $ go get golang.org/x/tools/cmd/ssadump > > $ ssadump -build=F fmt > > > > Alternatively, the cmd/vet tool in the standard library has an internal > subpackage that constructs the control-flow graph of a function. In this > representation, each block contains a sequence of Go statements and > expressions, not low-level SSA instructions. > > > > Which of these forms of control-flow graph is most appropriate depends on > the (unmentioned) problem you're trying to solve. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
