So, the idea is to penalize people who a) have a different opinion about the usefulness of versioning or b) keep their APIs stable and don't see a need to version something that never changes?
Needless to say, I consider that a bad idea (given, that I have strongly differing opinions about the usefulness of versioning). Why can't the idea not succeed based on it's own merit (or lack thereof)? But whatever. Set minds won't be swayed by arguments, I guess. I'll also point out (again) that this thread, originally, was about a central repository. Not about versioning. On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Edward Muller <edwar...@interlix.com> wrote: > Yes, use that proposal's format. > > Re: godoc. Great idea. if no one else is interested in doing the work I'll > be happy to take a look into it. I've been looking for an excuse to work > with gddo > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:42 PM Dave Cheney <d...@cheney.net> wrote: > >> Indeed. If only there was some standard we could use >> >> https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/ >> 12302-release-proposal.md#tag-format >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Nate Finch <nate.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Listing versions on godoc is an awesome idea. Peer pressure goes a >> long way >> > toward changing individual minds and eventually a community. Something >> as >> > simple as sorting projects with tagged versions higher and displaying >> them >> > prominently on the project's godoc page (with the ability to look at >> godoc >> > for each version) would go a long way toward encouraging people to tag >> their >> > releases. I know it would get me off my butt to tag my projects. >> > >> > On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 11:37:54 AM UTC-4, mbohu...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I was just wondering whether a simple list of available versions at the >> >> top of a package's godoc.org page wouldn't somehow force package >> authors to >> >> start tagging. There could be some kind of message if there are no >> available >> >> versions. >> >> There would obviously have to be some benefit for those who tag, or >> some >> >> restriction for those who don't, in order to change the current >> situation. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
