On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 12:26:18 PM UTC+8, Volker Dobler wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, 23. August 2016 04:58:31 UTC+2 schrieb T L:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:28:54 PM UTC+8, Volker Dobler wrote:
>>>
>>> Because pointers to interface are almost never needed. So why complicate
>>> the language for the sake of consistency nobody will ever notice
>>> during the day job?
>>>
>>
>> Just for a better consistency.
>>
>>
> Consistency is no end in itself.
>

I think the rule is quite simple, the method set of *T is a superset of the 
method set of T.
This should also true if T is already a pointer type.
 

>
> V. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to