On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:28:54 PM UTC+8, Volker Dobler wrote: > > Because pointers to interface are almost never needed. So why complicate > the language for the sake of consistency nobody will ever notice > during the day job? >
Just for a better consistency. Pointers to interface are not useless totally. Many std libs need pointers to interface. > > V. > > Am Montag, 22. August 2016 16:10:45 UTC+2 schrieb T L: >> >> And why value of *I can't call methods of I? where I is an interface type. >> >> Looks there are many inconsistencies in golang. >> >> On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 10:04:31 PM UTC+8, T L wrote: >>> >>> . >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
