It's funny that you mention libraries using vendoring because that's been a big deal surrounding this topic.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-dev/4FfTBfN2YaI/WCza__MaCgAJ On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 4:15:06 PM UTC-7, Chad wrote: > > Actually, nevermind. I was thinking about libraries using vendoring. But > that's probably a misuse. > > On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 12:50:47 AM UTC+2, Chad wrote: >> >> So if we decided that vendoring always used HEAD, that would ideally >> force people to have stable APIs (plus, why vendor an unstable/ in-flight >> API anyway) >> >> Couldn't it enable a change of behaviour for go get when a vendor >> directory is detected and solve some of the issues related to type equality >> (by having a single pkg path for a vendored package) ? >> >> >> >> On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 12:14:02 AM UTC+2, Dave Cheney wrote: >>> >>> Yes, exactly. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
