Actually, nevermind. I was thinking about libraries using vendoring. But that's probably a misuse.
On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 12:50:47 AM UTC+2, Chad wrote: > > So if we decided that vendoring always used HEAD, that would ideally force > people to have stable APIs (plus, why vendor an unstable/ in-flight API > anyway) > > Couldn't it enable a change of behaviour for go get when a vendor > directory is detected and solve some of the issues related to type equality > (by having a single pkg path for a vendored package) ? > > > > On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 12:14:02 AM UTC+2, Dave Cheney wrote: >> >> Yes, exactly. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
