Am 06.04.22 um 16:06 schrieb Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users: >> Given recent events: can't you spare us your stupid signature? > > Matthias should be, and is, free to advocate for his beliefs in his > signature. Just as I am free to comment on a political statement that I find provocative, blatantly wrong and in the context of current events almost derisive.
> > If we don't stand up for people's right to peacefully say things we > don't like, we have failed as a community. Then stand up for *my* right to peacefully say things as well. Or perhaps just mind your own business. > > I say this as an American who's a fanatical supporter of NATO. Leave > the guy alone, and let's get back to discussions about GnuPG. Thanks. :) American or whatever: fanatics are always suspicious to me. Apart from that: What I do or say is not yours to decide. And I don't need your advice in this matter. And the OP is probably able to speak for himself. The signature is a provocative political statement and it therefore has to be expected and is probably even intended that people react to it. And so I did. That's all. Like it or not. Rainer _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
