The only thing that I can say is that I would rather see a FAQ that reflect the current inplementation of GPG than a non-up to date FAQ per lack of user consensus (1).
The problem there is without community buy-in, the FAQ lacks credibility. It's supposed to be the *community's* FAQ, which is why people consider it authoritative. "This is Rob's thinking" would be, to say the least, controversial: some people think I explain things accurately and clearly, and others think I've been sniffing glue since a tender age.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
