Ditto, But don’t tell the Australian Government, it’s probably on their back door request list…;)
> On 8 Nov 2018, at 01:26, Bear Giles <bgi...@coyotesong.com> wrote: > > FWIW I distrust encrypted drives using hardware encryption. This came out > just a few days ago: > https://thehackernews.com/2018/11/self-encrypting-ssd-hacking.html > <https://thehackernews.com/2018/11/self-encrypting-ssd-hacking.html>: Flaws > in Popular Self-Encrypting SSDs Let Attackers Decrypt Data. > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:15 PM Nicholas Papadonis > <nick.papadonis...@gmail.com <mailto:nick.papadonis...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Interesting. How about this for a start? > > http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/summerian-ancient-mesopotamia-ancient-lock.jpg > > <http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/summerian-ancient-mesopotamia-ancient-lock.jpg> > http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/anunnaki1.jpg > <http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/anunnaki1.jpg> > http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/summerian-Winged_Human-headed_Bulls.JPG > <http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/summerian-Winged_Human-headed_Bulls.JPG> > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 7:21 PM open...@foocrypt.net > <mailto:open...@foocrypt.net> <open...@foocrypt.net > <mailto:open...@foocrypt.net>> wrote: > Hi Nick > > Have You tried The FooKey Method ? https://foocrypt.net/the-fookey-method > <https://foocrypt.net/the-fookey-method> > > Also, > > I will be sourcing public addendum's as addendum's to my submission into the > Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security [ > https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018/Submissions > > <https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018/Submissions> > ] regarding the committee’s review of the 'Telecommunication and Other > Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018' after the Melbourne > Cup. It will be similar to the open request for the Defence Trade Control Act > review performed by the former Inspector General of Intelligence, Dr Vivian > Thom. > > https://foocrypt.net/independent-review-of-the-defence-trade-controls-act-2012-cth-call-for-information-for-submission-as-a-case-study-from-the-openssl-community > > <https://foocrypt.net/independent-review-of-the-defence-trade-controls-act-2012-cth-call-for-information-for-submission-as-a-case-study-from-the-openssl-community> > > > -- > > Regards, > > Mark A. Lane > > Cryptopocalypse NOW 01 04 2016 > > Volumes 0.0 -> 10.0 Now available through iTunes - iBooks @ > https://itunes.apple.com/au/author/mark-a.-lane/id1100062966?mt=11 > <https://itunes.apple.com/au/author/mark-a.-lane/id1100062966?mt=11> > > Cryptopocalypse NOW is the story behind the trials and tribulations > encountered in creating "FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical Encryption." > > "FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical Encryption." is aimed at hardening > several commonly used Symmetric Open Source Encryption methods so that they > are hardened to a standard that is commonly termed 'QUANTUM ENCRYPTION'. > > "FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical Encryption." is currently under export > control by the Australian Department of Defence Defence Export Controls > Office due to the listing of Cryptology as a ‘Dual Use’ Technology as per the > ‘Wassenaar Arrangement’ > > A permit from Defence Export Control is expected within the next 2 months as > the Australian Signals Directorate is currently assessing the associated > application(s) for export approval of "FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical > Encryption." > > Early releases of "Cryptopocalypse NOW" will be available in the period > leading up to June, 2016. > > Limited Edition Collectors versions and Hard Back Editions are available via > the store on http://www.foocrypt.net/ <http://www.foocrypt.net/> > > © Mark A. Lane 1980 - 2016, All Rights Reserved. > © FooCrypt 1980 - 2016, All Rights Reserved. > © FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical Encryption. 1980 - 2016, All Rights > Reserved. > © Cryptopocalypse 1980 - 2016, All Rights Reserved. > > > >> On 5 Nov 2018, at 10:35, Nicholas Papadonis <nick.papadonis...@gmail.com >> <mailto:nick.papadonis...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Comments >> >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 5:56 PM Bear Giles <bgi...@coyotesong.com >> <mailto:bgi...@coyotesong.com>> wrote: >> > I'm considering encrypting a tar archive and optionally a block file >> > system (via FUSE) using either utility >> >> Linux has good support for encrypted filesystems. Google LUKS. >> >> BTW a tar file starts with the name of the first entry. The 'magic numbers' >> are at offset 128 or so. However a compressed tar file will start with a >> known value since gzip, b2zip, and 7zip?, all start with their magic values. >> >> Does tar placing known data at a certain offset increase the probability >> that someone can perform an attack easier? They may already know the data >> to decrypt at that offset and if the encrypted block overlaps, then the >> attack is easier. >> >> Thanks >> -- >> openssl-users mailing list >> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users >> <https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users> > > -- > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users > <https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users>
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
