On 05/17/2018 03:24 AM, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > On 17/05/18 09:11, Bernhard Reiter wrote: >> I agree that technically HTML (with it extensions) is a bad format to serve >> this need. Similiar to PDF. One RTF was an approach Nextstep's mail took >> and that got some adoption, but not enough. Today it would be some very >> simple >> wiki markup language. > > Content-type: text/markdown ;-)
Wouldn't Markdown potentially suffer from the same types of problems? Or am I missing something? -- Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
