On 28.03.2016 19:16, Daniel Villarreal wrote: > Should we not strive to use gnupg v2x ? I always try to use gpg2 on > the command-line, whereas documentation seems to show gpg. > > example... > Encrypting and decrypting documents > https://gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN111
Depending on the system, the gnupg 2.x executable is still called 'gpg'. I guess it depends on if the distributor wants to keep easy backwards compatibility. On archlinux, for example, there is only one gnupg package and it currently ships 2.1.11. The executable is called gpg. I'd think all distributions will do that at some point since 2.x is meant to replace 1.x. Regards, Viktor
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
