After much delay, I've started work on overhauling the FAQ and making the changes I've been threatening for some time. So far the only commits have been minor things not worthy of mention, but I'm about to make a significant content change and I'd like to get the community's feedback on it.
Namely, I plan on dropping (most) mention of 1.4. 1.4 will get mentioned as an older branch of GnuPG meant for system administrators, but for the rest of the FAQ I plan on focusing entirely on GnuPG 2.0 and 2.1. My rationale for this is simple: we don't want to encourage new users to use 1.4. We want to encourage new users to use 2.0 and/or 2.1. Some tools (e.g., Enigmail) now require 2.0 or later. I, personally, don't think it's a big deal to drop mention of 1.4 except to talk about "it's for system administrators, not regular users". However, I'd really like to hear your feedback on this. Should we make this change? Yes or no?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
