-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 at 12:34:42 AM, in
<mid:5508c822.20...@sixdemonbag.org>, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Yes. My list was comprehensive ("what the new set
> should be"), not differential ("what needs changing").
> :)
Whilst I realise you were specifically concentrating on defaults for
new key generation, perhaps a fully comprehensive discussion of GnuPG
defaults would be useful. This could be partly informed by people
looking through their GnuPG.conf files at the options they have chosen
to to change.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Dreams come true on this side of the Rainbow too!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=
=G7jc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
