On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:24, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: >> as did a few other maintainers. However there was not only not a >> consensus to do this more generally, there was active opposition to >> doing it at all. > > that's a bummer :(
I guess that is a GPL issue. They don't want any GPLed stuff for the core. However, there are other implementations and in particular a signature verification tool is pretty simple. It might even make sense to write one stripped down for the Ed25519 signature verification. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
