> On 17 Feb 2015, at 21:03, Sandeep Murthy <s.mur...@mykolab.com> wrote: > > As a user, not a developer on MacGPG, the issues previously > raised here about the remote execution of scripts etc. may be > questionable, but they do not directly affect my use of the software, > which is nothing but a front end for GnuPG.
If MacGPG were not a fork that would be the situation. Alas, it *is a fork and not just a front-end* for GPG. There are binary level differences from upstream which the average user does not know, nor should they need to. > The GPG plug-in for Apple Mail is not without its shortcomings but > it is incredibly easy to use and works well the other components > of the GPG suite. I have not used Enigmail, but it’s simply a > question of choice. I agree. I wouldn’t like anything better than to have all users using an open source client but I don’t have any illusions of getting there any time soon. Thus, plugins for the system default are necessary. -- Ville _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
