-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Friday 13 February 2015 at 10:19:06 AM, in <mid:54ddcf9a.5070...@vulcan.xs4all.nl>, Johan Wevers wrote: > On 13-02-2015 1:44, Jerry wrote: >> Inline totally destroys a "sig delimiter" In an OpenPGP-aware mail client, that is the decision of the developer. For example, is there any huge reason why it would be a bad idea to treat <dash><space><dash><dash><newline> the same as they treat <dash><dash><space><newline>? > It is supposed to sign and/or encrypt the sig too. >> and adds a lot of useless garbage to the message body. > You need a mailclient to interpret that. Mail clients > interprete Mime attachments too (or not). In my opinion, one of the strengths of Inline is that you _don't_ need a mail client to interpret it: the message can be pasted into a text file or a command window. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Maybe YOU have nothing to hide; that still leaves plenty you want to hide from! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU3eepXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwKDEH/jbh2mG6iKkRiNROUHjnV9a9 g2UosK2Ye9bycNIQrlhR2Jicie0URtzOgeCi889qcXO1z1TxlM+/QPdkGJyuaFbA R1CQouXaM8tXNek3DRc3r6DSU985Q0sQBGm2qsesxzN6cu6CcZcQYY0CmGs6hcY/ nrp3tC9REwTefMj/zBPuCuf6PJfW4ohI6U+VragDJQJi8xCjHpPTbBPItcaNWX2D n9qcJRDGxT/wNYcx77d86blEPKFeU2Ej+WJU9jLu+0js4a5Oi9bQXFBXHs/xwsz5 df9wsxCRxFQ3RstRwzOWzKi90T1k6EqxlmpPM+dT1Oj5v2Ud8ufJCyssHYdFZyaI vgQBFgoAZgUCVN3ntV8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45BFhAQAxrPhfKqDeFUgJ6wR/NMpSFgQX +rDsD6strw3YodyeQAEAdBaB5H3MrrINIydLXqWQ20pFW4Q81YjQ5+g8ZcopmAk= =2SaR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
