On 11/24/2014 09:57 AM, michaelquig...@theway.org wrote: > MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote on 11/22/2014 > 04:16:38 PM: > >> From: MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> >> To: "michaelquig...@theway.org on GnuPG-Users" <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> >> Cc: "michaelquig...@theway.org" <michaelquig...@theway.org> >> Date: 11/22/2014 04:16 PM >> Subject: Re: Encryption on Mailing lists sensless? >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> Hi >> >> >> On Wednesday 19 November 2014 at 7:50:32 PM, in >> > <mid:ofbe3b7f0e.c137fe74-on85257d95.006c7c99-85257d95.006cf...@theway.org>, >> michaelquig...@theway.org wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> Which of course would not be possible if the public >>> mailing list was all encrypted. >> >> Unless the search engine subscribed to the encrypted list and produced >> search results in the clear. >> >> - -- >> Best regards > > And I'm not sure what we would be doing there except burning extra CPU > cycles encrypting everything that's now publically available because the > search engine has it all decrypted.
Well, membership would presumably be by invitation only. With end-to-end encryption, recipients could be confident about the integrity of messages. And messages could be uniquely watermarked for each recipient, so that leakers could be identified, and dropped from the list. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
