-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 08/18/2014 09:03 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> The article also mentions the issue of inspections at border >> crossings which are not criminal investigations. > > A U.S. appellate court recently ruled that inspections of laptop > contents at border crossings violated the Fourth Amendment. It's > currently being appealed, but so far the tea leaves are the > Supreme Court won't touch it and will instead simply let the > appellate decision stand. Just FYI. :)
At least for US persons, iirc the protection doesn't extend beyond that? - -- - ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk - ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 - ---------------------------- Potius sero quam numquam Better late then never -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT8k5sAAoJEPw7F94F4TaguwkP/j2m6HBdFskiyQtcriEfMOus +uaOCoSQOXyoF1G/PZILne66o1PkrMgjd4K7I1Mzg5CvI061V0YAjlskwMo5/y3J 92hZivc14GMdusk6ozhLtnd+lP2V6XUUfuxoPOJJ+jwlpnMMfb5iliCg6GmVm2FI iQN1UY7+VpJVHebnT2vkYPAmIBrzFkJ3F7lJKo0uNygPwa0LK4EWq7oOWCRLAiOC sDOQYM3L4RDt1bx2VWQcH9Sp/O6gNJMJb1/E0o/0i25owtiO77F7IM8AWMA3H69Y G2FJTfs32sCcIG93OQftdZIGjLKa9+LiqrMVvcZvMmbubtkB37DSScZJNDrVKGik fhBV3wUL7XfJ3SRoaHN9oAX8wb+B/2tyB0eGy9Fmt6A2InO5KRDC5Su+qld/f1xi CqbuICZ0b/EDzSVewanRVPWj7uNHg61Cn+3UdnFE0QT4iMGX9wKq+P5abEyenG6p u+hwD62g8QsWtBtALe+SIObwXTXJtK/9HvKZT7sUm4ygzB+rjy7W3Lwi2pFOCMR0 E0IZST/Kh7g7acbhrkrvWlWgSChNFfHQErL64IHckeATVudgHVw1346oQZoNBtvq cn3vgU+4x84Oh/K1n8T1/k2nUejVy2InMqwTcuHFEJpxV5D2Agw2yF3XUJBT9HaU Nrok4Vu1aNVRB2aWMOsl =0WAA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
