-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Saturday 3 May 2014 at 9:50:47 AM, in <mid:caau18hfmcwf3gv68b_d_y9rr9jvuo_a0nea6vrgr+zb4oy3...@mail.gmail.com>, Nicholas Cole wrote: > [*] I'm aware there are problems with "marginal trust" > related the fact that the requirement of three > marginally trusted signatures to confer validity may in > fact be fairly weak. The three signatures may not, in > fact, be made independently of each other (consider > three keys owned by the same person which all introduce > a third key, for example, or multiple signatures made a > single key-signing party). The default is three but you can change it to whatever number you want. I wonder what the effect might be if the default trust level "I don't know or won't say" were treated in calculations as a marginal-marginal, needing perhaps the cube or fourth power of the required number of marginals to confer validity? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Life is a holiday. In the same way that glass is a liquid. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlNmHppXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pBjID/2jKJIrNVmrXq9HnWYUot14bJuFid0v0Hbfs Gm/hooiOEcDm81FHShkm6gS5kwdSUNgBJBkVt1d2cdGQE71ZFQmbKxF8EwANxVmK Y3WIZH6iPIQnKf98QoA+JDl4uDw3prsXR5InHaI6K/ugFKg3ceVNHTeMLMBOQYas SQkw+0A+ =kFjn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users