Il 03/05/2014 01:10, Daniel Kahn Gillmor ha scritto: > Having such an assertion cryptographically bound to the OpenPGP > certificate in parseable form implies in some sense that you think a > mechanical process (e.g. WoT calculated validity) should be able to make > use of it. But how would that work? Making WoT calculator avoid looking for keys signed by that user if reached throught my certification.
> It sounds like you'd want to ask > an OpenPGP to introduce an additional concept on top of the notions of > validity and ownertrust (which are already confusing): They work: I'm *really* confused. :) > some sort of meta-ownertrust: instead of ownertrust's question of: > "how much am i willing to rely on NdK's identity assertions", Well, if ownertrust answers that, it's what I need: a way to say "I am sure this key belongs to X, but I don't want it to be used to introduce more keys in the WoT". > meta-onwertrust would ask > "how much am i willing to believe NdK's assessments of certification > practice quality?" Who is going to understand this question? What kind > of UI would you suggest for it? No, it's not what I meant. BYtE, Diego. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users