> To somebody who simply contacted the supplier of a "free" service to > instruct them to cancel the free service, it is quite a substantial > unexpected bill: to many people, choosing to pay it may equate to > choosing not to eat for two or three days.
I find it unlikely someone who has the financial means to keep a server provisioned will be left unable to eat for two or three days over a $25.90 fee. Inconvenienced, sure, but that inconvenience is the result of improper planning on their part. Further, you are not asking StartSSL to "cancel the free service." This isn't about asking StartSSL to stop doing something: this is about asking them to *do something new* -- generate a revocation certificate and ensure it gets propagated to all the certificate revocation lists. That's nontrivial. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
