-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Saturday 26 April 2014 at 6:14:07 PM, in <mid:535be95f.1040...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton wrote: > But there are other mechanisms besides signatures that > will allow you to use the key, Such as? Without signatures or "trust-model always" my email app throws an error message and will not encrypt to that key, or even display a message signed by it. > so I'm not sure that > word captures the essence of the activity adequately. > I have a variety of local signatures for keys that I > have verified belong to a certain user, but for a > variety of reasons I don't wish to export those > signatures. Fair enough. A local signature has *potential* meaning beyond simply allowing you to use the key. But I feel "activating" fully captures the essence when the local signature is made with the default "(0) I will not answer." in response to "How carefully have you verified the key you are about to sign actually belongs to the person named above?" - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Wise men learn many things from their enemies. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlNeUolXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5p8ZQD/1pPOfkLiTL7FRowHKUhRkvLALobGAAzmx/k UQhh6mHwoR6dIgEvEZ/sbm6DY37kWKxSuT15wNrOXeEjNuePz+UJXRNKOQHEgnOb xp1FEbZprc6/mjYQObHl4QTjyWvzWC/lzeoe6apH6s3vfo24yTlw+ruN1ivT334Y h/Jc90oc =UdcR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
