-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/26/2014 05:43 AM, MFPA wrote: | Hi | | | On Friday 25 April 2014 at 3:49:30 AM, in | <mid:1691426.OzBBnA61Yg@inno>, Hauke Laging wrote: | | |> Thus I would like to offer "accepted" as a possible |> alternative. I guess that shows the user decision. |> Maybe even as a combination: "authenticity accepted". | | In the case of a non-exportable signature made simply to allow me to | encrypt to a key, I am not "accepting" or "authenticating" or | "validating" or "verifying" that key. All I am doing is "activating" | it for use.
But there are other mechanisms besides signatures that will allow you to use the key, so I'm not sure that word captures the essence of the activity adequately. I have a variety of local signatures for keys that I have verified belong to a certain user, but for a variety of reasons I don't wish to export those signatures. Doug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTW+lfAAoJEFzGhvEaGryEknsH/j5oxv/nKRIA/v2hO0X2zkpX NzvHkG8kjiQXcuMrQI/xZ6DngT4dF+zVg41+HM/YfB278JllrAciOld+K57B63V7 wFf9Bj+WTw6U0zNN7oPmytZ7nnHRQyb8dHxKN28mdSLxemgpE0moQf2zYINwceIs uo2ioz2oD5GSmqvitxGP+DOEFuZaNQSEuOJ7Z3zzE0g92tbw0d+yciTpe9D/SCOf wDIjhbMScAsCAnjp/SQILvj13bawBWwPn9Nlue/8+nA/S6mZakgLFkJPtIsVWPuD anxfVdeqDXRNZSO5V5foIHhZTiRu7ubgwXwHVqSi9hn8zVZnYFZxFIa0WhD6xXk= =APgc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
