Am Mi 23.04.2014, 20:32:27 schrieb MFPA: > Say a user has two keys, 0x0123456789abcdef and 0xfedcba9876543210. I > propose each key could sign the other with a signature notation > something like:- > siblings-0x0123456789abcdef-0xfedcba9876543...@example.org.
a) You always want to use fingerprints instead. b) You do not need any reference to a key anyway because it is absolutely clear which keys this statement refers to if one key signs another. c) I would like to handle that with an generic notation. I see a strong need for an expression about the relation of the signer to the owner of the signed key. It makes a big difference whether I say "This is some foreigner which has shown me some ID (see separate notation for details)" or "This is my sister". Thus I would like to have a notation "relation@" which would in this case have a value like "identity" or "self", maybe with some additional information like "self: business". Hauke -- Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/unterstuetzer/ http://userbase.kde.org/Concepts/OpenPGP_Help_Spread OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
