Il 03/01/2014 11:28, Hauke Laging ha scritto: > But I do not suggest to make my configuration the default. I just want > to be able to use it. Sometimes it's best to send a signed cleartext > message, sometimes to send an unsingned encrypted message, sometimes a > first signed then encrypted message and I want to stress that sometimes > it's best to send a first encrypted then signed (or signed-encrypted- > signed) message. I can't come up with a situation where sign, encrypt, sign again w/ *same* key used in the first signature gives more security than first encrypt then sign. So two layers are enough.
I (partially) get your point: receiving an encrypted message could mislead an uneducated user... But I doubt someone w/ access to top secret material falls in that category :) BYtE, Diego. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
