> From: "Peter Lebbing" <pe...@digitalbrains.com> > > - You ask people, when they certify you, to certify both keys. It's a rare > > event, it's not that big of a burden all in all. > > A small detail I forgot to mention: people sign key/UID pairs. Obviously when > you have an UID "Klaus <kl...@employer1.de>" and you go work for employer2, > that > UID should be revoked and you will lose signatures on that UID. But you can > also[1] add an UID "Klaus", without e-mail, and get that certified. That UID > will still be valid, and there are multiple options for people sending you > mail > to <kl...@employer2.de>:
That is currently maybe the best way, but it creates another problem: What if I have/want to still be available under my old address? One solution would be not to split between private/work, but between secure/unsecure. When I leave employer1, I will remove the UID for this address from the unsecure and add it to my secure key. That way, I will still be able to receive new mail on my home machine. Will it harm to have the same email-part of an UID for two keys? e.g. - Klaus (secure) kl...@employer1.de - Klaus (unsecure) kl...@employer1.de Klaus -- Diese E-Mail wurde aus dem Sicherheitsverbund E-Mail made in Germany versendet: http://www.gmx.net/e-mail-made-in-germany _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
