On 08/22/2013 10:05 AM, Hauke Laging wrote:
> The wording "GnuPG extends" seems inappropriate to me as it is indeed an RfC 
> that extends 4880 in this way:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5581

I agree, it is inappropriate.  On the other hand, I was not aware of the
RFC.  Thank you for telling me about it!  :)


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to