On 08/22/2013 10:05 AM, Hauke Laging wrote: > The wording "GnuPG extends" seems inappropriate to me as it is indeed an RfC > that extends 4880 in this way: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5581
I agree, it is inappropriate. On the other hand, I was not aware of the RFC. Thank you for telling me about it! :) _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
