On 08/22/2013 09:56 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > GnuPG extends this with support for Camellia-128, Camellia-192 and > Camellia-256. I don't know the reasoning for introducing Camellia, but > I'm sure there's a solid basis for it.
Camellia in OpenPGP is now a published part of the spec, complete with symmetric algorithm number assignments from the IANA: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5581 > The best way to get GnuPG to support SERPENT is to convince the IETF > OpenPGP Working Group to add SERPENT to the symmetric cipher profiles. And the best way to do get started on the path to standardization is to provide a patch for an existing implementation (probably using an algorithm number from the experimental range [0] that implements it, to demonstrate feasibility. Using RFC 5581 as a template for the proposed draft would probably be the quickest path to getting it documented and agreed upon in an acceptable way. Regards, --dkg [0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-9.2
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
