On 08/28/2012 03:48 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 28/08/12 15:37, No such Client wrote: > >> smut? You imply that I speak in a perverse or sexual manner? Hardly. >> > I didn't want to actually quote the insulting stuff, but let me quote > nonetheless: > > >> your own bed, and the chance to make many new friends >> > # a man being detained for encrypting things, and going to jail? free silver > bracelets and a free ride ? ... > handcuffs and an interrogation (chat) ... jail buddies? I thought that was a no-brainer.. > (note that this is easily read, and probably meant, to refer to an underage > child! Your whole reply is centered around the daughter that was brought up in > the conversation. How dare you talk like that about the actual daughter of > another member of this mailing list?) > > # i speak of no ones daughter. I use a (fictional) metaphor for government > (daddy), and child (citizen) regarding privacy rights, and later on, I use > the same frame, and change the metaphor, implying that various > security-minded organizations can easily detain an individual for personal > gain (they want to date the wife who sent naked photos to her husband , his > detention is there to socially discredit him and get him out of the way, of > the would-be suitor..) >> if the sender is a reasonably attractive woman, I could definately make >> the case for prolonging the investigation [...] to see where things will >> lead with mommy >> > # speaking now from the perspective of your average security-focused > individual, who has a self-interest in getting with the woman who sent naked > photos of herself, and simply wants to remove her husband from the picture so > he can make a move.. >
> Please do not insult my intelligence by acting like I misread it. This will be > the last I have to say about it. > > # no insults from my end Mr.Lebbing. I was being sarcastic, not rude. If you feel slighted, please be aware that interpretations may vary. I have simply sent my intended interpretation, but you are equally entitled to possess your own interpretation. What a sender wishes to convey is not always the same as what a recipient receives or understands. So in the crypto-world, we sign things. Here, I am simply explaining my intended meaning of the word. Such is the risk with sarcasm and allegory. Misinterpretation.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
