On Tuesday 28 of August 2012 01:44:54 No such Client wrote: > Sir Hansen: > Well, pseudonyms do not make my words less valid. I am not one of the > gpg-using advocates, who has to be open, and forthcoming with all to > make a point. A pseudonym is well within my rights. You simply don´t > need to know. That assymetric advantage is your own fault. It was yor > choice to use a name. Don´t discredit me for being more.. distrusting.. > I didn´t know that gmail is disposable.. hmm.. Once again, we all are > subjected to what Mr.Hansen feels. If you read NDA´s carefully, not all > agencies (not units) are the same when it comes to disclosure. Speaking > in generalities is quite legal depending on context, country, purpose, > and ofc what agency one is affiliated with. (It is not neccesarily the > same in your country as it is elsewhere. ) Nice strawman , and a perfect > example of implicit assumptions however.
The fact that you've just showed up on The list makes this e-mail and pseudonym disposable, not the fact you're using a pseudonym or gmail. Besides, gmail is very much disposable. It's not like you have to provide your name, surname and ID document scan to get a gmail account... Regards, -- Hubert Kario QBS - Quality Business Software 02-656 Warszawa, ul. Ksawerów 30/85 tel. +48 (22) 646-61-51, 646-74-24 www.qbs.com.pl _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
