Am Di 29.05.2012, 21:29:51 schrieb Werner Koch: > I have said this at least a hundred times, but it is still not known > well enough.
You probably mean: "Among the readers of this list." How much known may it be in the wild...? > Would an option --annotate which enables > --with-colons, --batch, and --status-fd be helpful? I don't think so because giving --with-colons, --batch, and --status-fd is not the problem. Making this easier should not have a big effect on the problem. The problem is knowledge (and discipline). So the aim should be to spread the knowledge. This could be done by printing a warning to stderr when stdin and stdout are not terminals and these options are not given: "You are probably running gpg non-interactively. In order not to break scripts it is strongly encouraged to use scripted output of gpg only with the options --with-colons, --batch and --status-fd. See http://www.gnupg.org/..."; Hauke -- PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
