-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 at 12:33:08 AM, in <mid:201106140133.09131.mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de>, Hauke Laging wrote: > You should tell apart who has to prove something. Your > argument is valid if the signer has to prove that he > has made the signature at (or before or after) a > certain date and time. His own signature is no proof in > that case as he can easily fake the timestamp. > If a third party has to prove that and when the signer > has signed a document then the signature timestamp is > perfectly OK. Suppose the party who originated the document to be signed subsequently presents (possibly faked) evidence showing the document to have been prepared later than the signature timestamp. The signer is now unexpectedly in the position of having to prove something. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com There is no snooze button for a cat that wants breakfast -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQE7BAEBCgClBQJN97W8nhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5ptlID/jG5 iQ/mY7tbhArxIDsT7O6RJcQcN6tMHmtQnQuFlPFUzebh57M1xfTBPn+fHnCJBl5h oDb/qKKU0OXSwcqrBkE42yhlc4KT2KE8bb9Yw/sqezS+qvijwlHqojnuQPtIby+Q mY8/54Z0Xj4m0HosIbGgjVXEuoEOHv5kGr0fLzb/ =1qYm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
