-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Monday 13 June 2011 at 9:19:18 PM, in <mid:BANLkTi=3fdptvrkpcd0gzhasviznlnq...@mail.gmail.com>, Jerome Baum wrote: > Yes, and it is trivial to write a fake date next to my > signature. That doesn't mean there are no legal > implications. In fact, just as I can commit fraud > (under the right circumstances) by writing that fake > date on a piece of paper, I can commit fraud by using a > fake time-stamp in an OpenPGP signature. Commit fraud, or make a trivial error... > Let's summarize: The signature time has potential legal > implications. Fair enough. But, as you illustrate above, it is trivial for a signature date/time to be incorrect. Therefore it is potentially unsafe to rely on them as being correct. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Nothing a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster won't cure! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQE7BAEBCgClBQJN9ohpnhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5p/4ID/iUX UbC2QZLJwcBsOOcGgNrrjhaR4tFPG0/RbKepbSP2kDi8XNH+zOAGgyrEqs8+iDBA ONgfhuMnJHGpj9t8R/cT9qO6ljesATM/JcVs8aUAC4ARHUis3OXI+LllVSFCo2Pg gVbriV8IpIXP7+naqa7L08/GWZ7qhd+4ydk7Bv6v =Cp0G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
