Just "blood-thing" about linguist reminds-me "language acquisition" anyways ....
On 28 May 2011 00:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:49:58 -0700, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> wrote: >> Summary: A 3-word password (e.g., "quick brown fox") is secure against >> cracking attempts for 2,537 years. >> >> http://www.baekdal.com/tips/password-security-usability > > A computational linguist's rebuttal to Baekdal's post: > > http://trochee.net/2011/05/fragments-will-not-save-us/ > > The takeaway: Baekdal's analysis only holds for extremely naïve brute > force attempts. Please don't assume that all attackers will be so > naïve. > > --dkg > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > > -- Gnupg key: 02375205 Fingerprint: F7CD D181 943B 0453 8668 AF16 84E9 7565 0237 5205 _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
