On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:46, Turbo Fredriksson <tu...@bayour.com> wrote:
> On 17 maj 2011, at 14.52, Jerome Baum wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 14:16, Turbo Fredriksson <tu...@bayour.com> wrote: > >> But the last part didn't end up at the 64 char limit the other lines have. >> Instead, the last >> char on that line is at position 15. Would that be a problem? > > > It doesn't sound good but just go ahead and try. How long does a single run > take? I'd say just start the run right now -- you can do other stuff while > it's running (e.g. looking further into the file), so just start it and move > on. > > > That didn't work unfortunatly :( > > ----- s n i p ----- > gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=49) > > gpg: mdc_packet with invalid encoding > gpg: decryption failed: Invalid packet > gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=0b) > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > cpio: premature end of file > ----- s n i p ----- > Well this is definitely taking a lot of resources. Are you able to recreate the data from the original? -- Jerome Baum tel +49-1578-8434336 email jer...@jeromebaum.com -- PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
