-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 El 16-05-2011 12:35, Jerome Baum escribió: ... > In the worst case, you may be looking at loosing everything from the > corruption point onwards, assuming some kind of stream compression. This > is IIRC the default for GnuPG when it encrypts. Otherwise you may be ...
> For the future, look at alternative ways to run this backup. Why > ascii-armor? Why gpg? Encrypting w/ gpg has a huge potential for data > loss in case of corruption -- of even a single bit. This isn't really an > issue with gpg, it simply doesn't _by default_ operate in a manner > designed for this. You may be able to tweak it, but how about this instead: I don't have an knowledge about compression algos, so I assume you are right. However, we can disable GPG's compression to avoid that problem. What is the advantage of encrypting data with OpenSSL over GPG? Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJN0aSsAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAv64H/3AQuDMVDh3A5HQ+f85VPCfA 4+jtVeEoTMxLXVXoWoh4+OrZev+Wiyo/zEDIu3RpRs1o/EV7kmZUcFslZebeHbkr laSqcBlJvcKhfknKnERkNb/oKBBxF+AsUhyi2P6GGc+3lvAQUx+F+0i/IJ6Y0Bix F4Q4kVf8OU1tJC0G5Tr5c65tiEXakRhrjj0Cdf2ZTevG4WzGq87NGPaN6NoNXUaO fJtQeYCvpaqTDyX4KDV0W/cQpDd2AnBMHATo7u5dfNA8aH5lF9+M2wfgsvuIL0jr 0rqkhcndeKwG2a25dk1eR3mG61/Y+5ZvBq7YCfMM678cRgvTJjtrvj5uoKg6AP0= =7/bT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
