-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Saturday 7 May 2011 at 9:52:51 PM, in <mid:BANLkTi=nwtmcchq96olpkhdmovunsoq...@mail.gmail.com>, Jerome Baum wrote: > I don't think you get what kind of assumption we are > talking about. There are two kinds: > 1. I assume something is generally true, e.g.: I assume > the world is around. > 2. I assume something is true within this scope, so I > don't have to restate the precondition with every > statement I make, e.g.: "assuming y < z, and z < x, we > can follow that y < x". It isn't really an argument to > say "you can't assume y < z, so the point is invalid". I agree that in this specific instance we can assume y < z. I do not agree that in general we can assume that an individual with expiry dates on their subkeys keeps their master key securely offline. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Don't ask me, I'm making this up as I go! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQE7BAEBCgClBQJNxbSdnhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pkxAD/Aoq p02FGwAMlU0hQX1GZPUeIhG1SOuCwWvj0OHJQNiJFJUE4hu6v8jlSoEpL6/YUk8N e2LTlTvjDwvf7KXPf5RDUtfC0EEQqo3CZYejAMDMerKS+9ni5b5oycerkoUHJ1Wu fpQLLB8wo6zp0MG8Ur8Thf+o5FlvohLoXP+zlTQx =BQFt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
