-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Saturday 7 May 2011 at 3:06:16 PM, in <mid:201105071606.21732.mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de>, Hauke Laging wrote: > Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011, 15:54:21 schrieb MFPA: >> You can't assume. > You can very well if you don't claim that for all cases but use this > assumption for distinguishung between a useful and a useless use if > expiration dates. AFAIR noone here on the list has claimed that it > makes sense (with respect to security) to use key expiration dates > without offline mainkeys. That is an important point in the > discussion. At what point does it become safe to assume that an individual with expiry dates on their subkeys keeps their master key securely offline? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Raining cats and dogs is better than hailing taxis. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQE7BAEBCgClBQJNxaDynhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pdSUD/jTu kidc9dx/CxOkkkt9vmi2NEkctq66dBkVPFbeWPHOVwQNafWNh+tnG9t2JTdgfDJZ LP6TXw0tE8dJsNIXaZO4RfvQbtaYNqFVIVxd+jUoihAsROV+DYbAjrMv89lW2j9K mJS4835oQludvIqrXQ6Yaw5voqhWYvWnTGcDs8Qh =9FId -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
