On 3/22/11 5:17 PM, MFPA wrote: > Is there any particular reason to jump from 2048 to 4096 rather than > use an intermediate value? 3072 maybe?
Not really. A 3K key is roughly a factor of 50,000 times harder to brute force. This is such a slender improvement that it's really not worth talking about. If 112 bits of effective security aren't enough for you, it's quite likely the 128 bits of effective security provided by RSA-3K aren't enough for you either. Honestly, I see more sense in RSA-15K than I do in RSA-4K. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
