-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Saturday 20 November 2010 at 11:24:41 PM, in <mid:20101120182441.22a71...@scorpio>, Jerry wrote: > This is a snippet of the header from the post in > question: > From: MFPA <expires2...@ymail.com> > To: "Jerry on GnuPG-Users" <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> > CC: "Jerry" <gnupg.u...@seibercom.net> > Subject: Re: Gpg4Win 2.0.4 with GnuPG 1.4.11?? > Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:56:03 +0000 > Reply-To: MFPA <expires2...@ymail.com> > X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.38) Professional Same format as any other posting I make to this list (except a thread starter). All taken care of automatically by message templates. And only differing from other lists I inhabit in two respects: this is the only list I post to that requires a "CC" to the previous poster, and the only one that doesn't reset the "Reply-To" header to the list address. > I have just created a rule that will send any Cc: from that user to the > bit bucket. Fair enough. I only offered a plausible answer to your musing as to why the thread starter considered the latest GnuPG 2.0.x version to be "unstable." It's beyond me why that shouls upset you so much. (-: - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com I hit the CTRL key but I'm still not in control! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTOh6MqipC46tDG5pAQrzyQQAiSv7n+LtoEUIX/dOPLhFdeFPj1Jrzmbu W9eCOJGT13IUsxNDzwRgoR4P6Cify881wXRtiAN6NOEjCHqDNmOXOa2pJvro30Ug rR9GsOZj7Y//OdW91KNk4yGo3UYLkuDOZCJihwNGnbj+/h+hgdJ5xAdt2v1Q+7f4 riEzhcPAMd4= =0mJz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users