On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:15:06 -0500 Charly Avital <shavi...@mac.com> articulated:
> Jerry wrote the following on 11/17/10 8:45 AM: > > PGP in-line is deprecated anyway. > > Interesting. Can you please document? Thanks. A simple Google: "in-line PGP deprecated" will turn up numerous hits. You also might want to see: Use PGP/MIME, aka RFC 3156 > > In any case, Outlook 2007 is deprecated also. Comparing a > > nearly four year old version is counter productive. Update to the > > 2010 version and see if your problems still exist. > > I have no intention to update Outlook because I don't intend to use it > for practical purposes, but thanks for the advice. If you have no practical use for it then why bother inquiring? You either use it or you don't. There is no such thing as "slightly pregnant". If you are going to use it, then use an updated version or don't complain. If I were to use an antiquated version of GnuPG and experienced problems, what do you think might be the first thing I would be advised to do? > This question should be answered by bo.bergl...@gmail.com. If you could not answer the question then why mention it in your original post? -- Jerry ✌ gnupg.u...@seibercom.net _____________________________________________________________________ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
