-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Sunday 8 August 2010 at 5:44:21 PM, in <mid:4c5edee5.1060...@sixdemonbag.org>, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Right, but at that point you're coming close to > cherrypicking -- disregarding data points in order to > reach a result that's more in line with your > preconceptions. Nobody ever wakes up and says, "today > I think I'll cherrypick." It's almost always a > subconscious process: "well, I can disregard that data, > it's clearly anomalous because..." I worded that very badly. Rather than throwing away data, I was trying to suggest looking at it in more detail. As a whole from day 1 to day n, the proportion not encrypted to the key was x. Fine as far as it goes, but did the figures confirm or refute my expectation that the proportion would be higher in the first few days and then decline to a steady level? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Was time invented by an Irishman named O'Clock? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTGA/fqipC46tDG5pAQofbwP+Lu/CZHhuRwwugUHZr0RU3rliFNTPnxZ2 Cr9ErYW9z7JXlwtoxOiUoUTzpgNRrHDgJGTZ7wGB2o4gSUQdH96c+eTimn0SpSzl Qnf1rmDYcYRY2HK680oHVSdgQpRyp1IaViCsqV2KifGWP87wnZS3d3rzedSYmM6L NeriaL7n19k= =K5IZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
