-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Monday 9 August 2010 at 7:30:40 AM, in <mid:4c5fa090.4080...@gmail.com>, Paul Richard Ramer wrote: > Actually, the number of encrypted messages that I > originally posted was incorrect. The real number is > 641. I replied to my original post and posted the > correct numbers. Yes, I received that message shortly after posting mine. >> I have difficulty counting those because my email >> program is poor at searching inside encrypted >> messages. It finds six plaintext, and this only rises >> to 13 if I tell it to also look inside encrypted >> messages; I know this is a very long way short. > 36 is correct. I was not disputing... > I took note of every NETMK (Not > Encrypted To My Key) message, who was complaining, and > who hadn't encrypted. Actually analysed and noted it down at the time? That's keen. >> How many of these 22 were within the first week or so? >> I find very few messages not encrypted to mine. > I agree with Hansen that this is seems almost like > cherry picking, My rationale was that I would expect the volume of messages not encrypted to a particular key to be highest before folks had time to notice it had been posted, and to then reduce to a more uniform level. I just wondered if the figures would bear this out. > but I will give it to you anyway. Six > in the first week and four in the last week. And a total of 12 spread over the fifteen weeks or so in between. Which proves nothing, of course. > But before you say, "Ah ha," know that four of the > first week's messages were from a person that had > successfully sent encrypted messages to me prior in > that same week. Yes, some people use more than one set-up for their encryption and don't update everything at the same time. Which is one reason why the incidence of missing a key from the encryption does not tail off as much after a few days from it's introduction as might be expected. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Was time invented by an Irishman named O'Clock? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTGA8Q6ipC46tDG5pAQq/rQP7B1R6Rchn7mR/YQeYkqqUbBHW1aaNeNOt W4WRrOEb4zB9flvI3n30Mo0fs5Ca5pkZXTaQ0ItajXOloNn66/UPp+H/XWWbsoDJ lmNNUG2kqNyoCOKpwt6oLBrzUIN0ZPIjZUUX2tJjQvFDoHJDp9a0Q40HVEzMYf4o aLf4s1CSDU4= =Po6I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
