On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:03:25PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Can anyone else verify messages sent by Andre? His message claims to > have a PGP signature, but what's in what should be the signature > block isn't.
Mutt isn’t verifying these either. The message Content-Type appears to be multipart/alternative, not multipart/signed. The attached signature looks to me like an OpenPGP signature with the following comment: Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ I suspect it’s Daniel’s signature being forwarded, but can’t verify. Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
