On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, David Shaw wrote:
OS X is an interesting case. The standard filesystem, as you note, is
HFS+ with journaling. Usually this is a danger sign for shredding as
the shred process doesn't know all the information it needs to do a
proper shredding job. However, Apple has shredding built-in to OSX, and
since both the shredder and the filesystem come from the same people,
it's at least possible that they did the necessary work to have this
shred properly (i.e. in a journal-sensitive way). Did they actually do
this? I have no idea, and would be curious to hear from someone who
does have a reference on this one way or the other. Apple tends to be
fairly stingy about this level of detail.
=================
test it!
fill a file with a few hundred copies of a random hash. as a control,
delete the file the normal way and try to find it on the disk (i'd expect
you can find it). repeat with a different hash, shred the file, and try
again to find it on the disk.
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"The National Government will regard it as its first
and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit
of unity and cooperation. It will preserve and
defend those basic principles on which our nation
has been built. It regards Christianity as the
foundation of our national morality, and the family
as the basis of national life."
-- Adolph Hitler
Proclamation to the German nation at Berlin,
1 February 1933
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users