> YES, this would do it; ok. thanks.
> however, proper etiquette would be to *not* send > B's Key to the Servers, but rather to returned it 'Signed' to B and let > B make any 'publication' decisions/actions. understood. > There are folks who are > _very_ picky about their Keys being in General Circulation! that said, is there any reason NOT to (or, any advantage to ...): *l*sign "B" with "A", and, therefore, NOT distribute "A" to the keyservers &/or via export -- and, instead, reference the "A" trust-ing-pubkey @ a web page? thanks. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
